Friday, 28 May 2010

Wednesday, 26 May 2010

Swan 2 - Goose 0

Yesterday morning I wrote here about the new arrivals on the Basin, and how the fathers seemed protective toward their young. Four hours later we observed this parental responsibility in dramatic form. The calm was shatterd and a fierce scrap broke out. One of the adult geese seemed to be causing concern to the male swan, possibly straying into the ‘home’ territory where the young cygnets had nested. Whatever the cause, it was sufficient to cause an almighty fray and then a fierce chase the length of the basin as the swan protected his space.

I learn from Wikipedia that swans are the largest members of the duck family and are amongst the largest flying birds. The largest species can reach lengths of over 60 inches, have a wingspan of almost 10ft, and weigh over 33 pounds. As this swan flew past me twice I felt it best to stand very very still and not distract him such that he turned his firepower onto me.










After the excitement and noise of the first battle at about 3pm, there was an almost identical repeat twenty minutes later. The goose returned for round 2, but he was again chased away by this very determined swan.

I shall keep my eye on events tomorrow: I’m not certain that the goose will make a safe escape a third time.





Tuesday, 25 May 2010

New arrivals on the basin

Finally, some really great weather. Strong sun, temperature in the high 20's, just a little breeze, real sitting-outside-weather. And look what has arrived to keep us company: two new families on the basin.

It's good to see the cygnets. We had two some years ago but they were killed when quite young, by an air rifle I believe.



In both families, the fathers seem quite protective, so it is not easy to get close to photograph them.





Thursday, 13 May 2010

Musings on the Election

So it’s all over. Cameron and Clegg have done the deal, they will be sharing offices, and it’s all over - until the next time. Some musings from the past few weeks.

I heard a lot of election coverage on the radio, mainly R4 and 5Live, over the full four weeks of the campaign. Far too much non-news was reported as news; too much speculation, often by people who just weren’t specialists. The rolling tv coverage on BBC and Sky suffered from plenty of the same problems.

There was an interesting talk at the Guardian, in front of an audience, which was recorded as one of their Election Podcasts. The panel was Polly Toynbee, John Harris, and Andrew Rawnsley. You can hear it here.

A fascinating session, well attended, with some insights into the differences between the three main parties and their campaigns.



A further thought: sitting in the Kings Place auditorium underneath the Guardian offices, I could almost have been sitting in the Radio Theatre at BBC Broadcasting House; the Guardian panel could have been a Radio 4 panel. How close some of the new-media online events are becoming to the old-media broadcast world. Is the BBC really alert to the growing ambition, talent, and output of this new competition?

A complete absence from tv and radio of the big-hitters, from all three parties. Very surprised that Labour made so little use of Alastair Darling, Alan Johnson, the Millibands. The Tories seemed to ignore what I though would be the voter appeal of Ken Clarke, or the views of the reconstructed Duncan Smith.

Just about zero presence of parties, posters, candidates and canvassers on my streets. Lack of funds, or an assumption that the sitting mp, on a 10,000 majority last time would be an automatic win? Contrast with the 2001 campaign when I spent 10 days helping in a safe Labour seat, with lots of leafleting, balloons, walkabouts and high visibility from the candidate.

Had it not been for Clegg after the first tv debate, and Mrs Duffy in Rochdale, this might have passed as a pretty boring campaign. It appears we always need at least one ‘Prescott punch’ moment!

I wonder if the post-mortems will highlight the foolishness of so many leader campaigns stops. Setting: a school/hospital/supermarket/market. Action: meet a few ‘real people’ (ie: selected party workers). Script: a two minute speech, photos, and then back into the bus/limo/train. We viewers quickly came to realise that Brown would walk confidently into a crowd, shake hands, ask one of three questions, not wait for nor engage with the answer, and keep walking, shaking more hands. Talking without listening does not equal communication.

TV coverage of these mini-events never showed a wide shot, revealing how few people attended. It’s as if the broadcasters are complicit in these deceits.

Coverage of the Leader’s wives……aargh!

Lots of new campaign organisations, which seem to pack quite a punch, getting plenty of air and web time. They can set up easily and cheaply, with a strong web presence and low overhead costs. Many of them exist to campaign for change to the political system. Here are a few I came across:

38 degrees (People. Power. Change) www.38degrees.org.uk/

Take Back Parliament: http://www.takebackparliament.com

Vote for a Change: www.voteforachange.co.uk/

Unlock Democracy: www.unlockdemocracy.org.uk/


The community organisers Citizens UK managed to get all three main party leaders together on the same platform, just four days before polling - something the broadcasters couldn’t achieve – and it appeared to be a very sucessful event, with 2,500 people attending, representing 160 organisations.

TV debates: on the whole a great success for the voter, but not for Cameron who by agreeing, opened the door for Clegg to introduce himself to the wider public. I also thought that Jeremy Paxman’s three interviews with the leaders were interesting, well handled, and well scheduled on BBC 1 at peak time.

It’s really good that the number of people voting increased, largely attributed to Cleggmania, although the weather on polling day must have helped.

Shocking that people were locked-out of the polling stations. Some undoubtedly will have left it late to stroll along from the pub, but others will just have finished work or family duties and been rightly very angry. Good to hear reports of increased voter registration in the days following the first tv debate, reportedly mainly young people.

No warning here that even if you queue for 2 hours you may not be allowed to vote

Of the very many ‘talking heads’, specialists in their own fields wheeled out on tv to explain to viewers just what is going on, my vote for the very best goes to Peter Hennessy. Historian, eminent specialist in the constitution, he presents complex issues in a most simple and appealing way; a pleasure to listen to.

To the pressures of 24/7 broadcasting, the incessant demands of rolling news, must be added the burden of five days of additional coverage required when the polling result was inconclusive. Being generous, I can only assume these are the reasons for the tensions and outbursts witnessed on Sky News. These three separate incidents are now all over the web:

Sky tv verbal punch up: Adam Boulton and Alastair Campbell:

Calls to Sack Kay Burley for this interview

And Boulton again, this time with Ben Bradshaw


Michael Portillo wrote a witty column about his famous 1997 “Were you up for Portillo” moment under the heading “Don’t worry: life’s better on the outside”

In advance of the election there was much written about this being the first internet election. Politicos were heard to say the dread phrases ‘social networking, twitter, facebook’ often without sounding as if they knew what these things were. Journos seemed to play up the effect of the web on Obama’s campaign, with the assumption it would have the same effect over here. In my view the web brought new ways of delivering news and opinions (Michael White’s daily and sometimes twice-daily blog delivered to your inbox). There were some great feeds on Twitter but you had to quickly learn to sort out those which were just ‘interesting’ from those which genuinely broke news, and/or brought a different opinion into view.

I went along to the ‘Fair Votes’ rally two days after polling, when the LibDems were deep in their negotiation with the Tories.



Billy Bragg

Rupert Murdoch's influence is everywhere

It started in Trafalgar Square (http://www.takebackparliament.com/page/s/rally) wound down Whitehall, passing the entrance to Downing St, paused in Parliament Sq (I didn't know you could still do this: I thought it was an arrestable offence) and on to Smith Square, where the LibDems were meeting.

I love this generic placard - you can use it at any event!

Passing Downing St. I thought New Labour had imposed a ban on demonstrations within 1 mile of Parliament



The cheering and jeering demonstrators passed Sky's open-air broadcast platform, as Kay Burley was live on air. The BBC wisely built an enclosed studio, a wise move given what happened to Sky (see above).





It was sweet to see new fresh faces on Newsnight, new MP’s being quite earnest, nervous, in their new suits, sitting forward eager to get their answers right. It won’t be long before they become familiar faces, trotting out their ‘on message’ lines.




I assume this will be the front cover photo on Private Eye next week. What will the caption be?

Labour party membership at the start of this year stood at about 166,000. The party website crashed hours after Cameron walked up Downing St, with the weight of new applications. They reported 2,292 new joiners on Tuesday 11th and a further 620 on the morning of the 12th.

UPDATE: on Thursday 13th UKLabour reports 4211 people joined the party yesterday.

Finally, a date for your diaries: the next election is due on Thursday 7th May 2015 – unless of course the coalition fails to coalesce.



Tuesday, 11 May 2010

Apocalyptic drama - 2

Lyn Gardner has a piece in the Guardian today:

What would you do if the world was going to end on Saturday? Definitely end, that is, there being nothing that could be done – by scientists, governments or maverick heroes – to avert the apocalypse. That's the starting point for A Thousand Stars Explode in the Sky, a new play that, unusually, is the product of not one but three writers, all at the top of their game.
see the full piece here:

Wednesday, 5 May 2010

Three playwrights and an apocalyptic drama

Just over seven weeks until Hannah is due, and here she is dancing the night away last weekend (that’s Patrick Stanier, her ‘buddy’ from their days at Guildhall).

PHOTO c Robin Rochford

She is now working as Assistant Director on her last production before her maternity break. It is the world premiere of A Thousand Stars Explode In The Sky, a new play written by three leading playwrights David Eldridge, Robert Holman and Simon Stephens, which opens at the Lyric Theatre, Hammersmith on May 7th.

Hannah has worked previously with the director Sean Holmes, and elsewhere with two of the writers.

This is a rare enterprise in British theatre, three writers collaborating on the one piece.* The play is set in the late 1990’s. As the universe begins to crumble a mother gathers her sons on their family farm in the north east of England, where they prepare to face the unknown. Will a lifetime’s worth of closely guarded secrets finally be revealed and will lost love once again be found before time itself comes to an end?

The Financial Times ran a good interview with the writers last week under the headline Three playwrights and an apocalyptic drama which you can read here

A Thousand Stars Explode In The Sky runs from the 7th May for four weeks. Full details, the cast, and online booking can be found here.

*When I worked at the Traverse Theatre in Edinburgh in the 1970’s we staged a production called Lay By, with seven writers: Howard Brenton, Brian Clark, Trevor Griffiths, David Hare, Steven Poliakoff, Hugh Stoddart and Snoo Wilson. It opened in August 1971 and the text can be found in the November 1971 edition of Plays and Players. I found this article in the Guardian about five women writers collaborating at the Royal Court in 2005, at the foot of which is a piece by David Edgar about his collaboration with Hare and Brenton.

Bank Holiday weather

Even the ducks outside my window deserved a break from the rain.